Availabilities:
| Location | Domestic | International |
|---|---|---|
| Online |
Unit description
Introduces students to the practical, performative and ethical arts of courtroom advocacy. Students learn about forensic rhetoric and other aspects of courtroom behaviours
Unit content
Topic 1: Advocacy as Rhetorical Performance
Topic 2: The Five Faculties of Rhetoric
Topic 3: Delivery: The Breath (“of an unfee’d lawyer”?)
Topic 4: Gesture, Costume, Staging and Props
Topic 5: Judgment and Fair Hearing
Topic 6: Persuasive Authority: Metaphor and Analogy
Topic 7: Mooting
Learning outcomes
Unit Learning Outcomes express learning achievement in terms of what a student should know, understand and be able to do on completion of a unit. These outcomes are aligned with the graduate attributes. The unit learning outcomes and graduate attributes are also the basis of evaluating prior learning.
| On completion of this unit, students should be able to: | GA1 | GA2 | GA3 | GA4 | GA5 | GA6 | GA7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | perform with technical competence, imagination and professionalism in methods of mooting and the arts of appellate court advocacy | Intellectual rigour | Knowledge of a discipline | Communication and social skills | ||||
| 2 | demonstrate practical awareness of the ethical aspects of the roles and responsibilities of courtroom advocates and judges | Intellectual rigour | Knowledge of a discipline | |||||
| 3 | show critical familiarity with classical, renaissance and modern theories and techniques of forensic rhetoric | Intellectual rigour | Knowledge of a discipline | |||||
| 4 | communicate complex ideas clearly and persuasively, by demonstrating the faculties of performance rhetoric | Intellectual rigour | Knowledge of a discipline | |||||
| 5 | demonstrate reflective appreciation of personal competence in the art of advocacy | Intellectual rigour | Knowledge of a discipline | |||||
On completion of this unit, students should be able to:
- perform with technical competence, imagination and professionalism in methods of mooting and the arts of appellate court advocacy
- GA1: Intellectual rigour
- GA4: Knowledge of a discipline
- GA6: Communication and social skills
- demonstrate practical awareness of the ethical aspects of the roles and responsibilities of courtroom advocates and judges
- GA1: Intellectual rigour
- GA4: Knowledge of a discipline
- show critical familiarity with classical, renaissance and modern theories and techniques of forensic rhetoric
- GA1: Intellectual rigour
- GA4: Knowledge of a discipline
- communicate complex ideas clearly and persuasively, by demonstrating the faculties of performance rhetoric
- GA1: Intellectual rigour
- GA4: Knowledge of a discipline
- demonstrate reflective appreciation of personal competence in the art of advocacy
- GA1: Intellectual rigour
- GA4: Knowledge of a discipline
Prescribed texts
- Kindle only edition : Adrian Whitfield QC, 2015, The Art of Persuasion: Tradition and Technique , Middle Temple.
Teaching and assessment
Fee information
Domestic
Commonwealth Supported courses
For information regarding Student Contribution Amounts please visit the Student Contribution Amounts.
Commencing 2020 Commonwealth Supported only. Student contribution band: 1
Fee paying courses
For POSTGRADUATE or UNDERGRADUATE full fee paying courses please check Domestic Postgraduate Fees OR Domestic Undergraduate Fees
International
Please check the international course and fee list to determine the relevant fees.