Availabilities:

Not currently available in 2021

Unit description

Introduces students to the practical, performative and ethical arts of courtroom advocacy. Students learn about forensic rhetoric and other aspects of courtroom behaviours

Unit content

Topic 1: Advocacy as Rhetorical Performance

Topic 2: The Five Faculties of Rhetoric

Topic 3: Delivery: The Breath (“of an unfee’d lawyer”?)

Topic 4: Gesture, Costume, Staging and Props

Topic 5: Judgment and Fair Hearing

Topic 6: Persuasive Authority: Metaphor and Analogy

Topic 7: Mooting

Learning outcomes

Unit Learning Outcomes express learning achievement in terms of what a student should know, understand and be able to do on completion of a unit. These outcomes are aligned with the graduate attributes. The unit learning outcomes and graduate attributes are also the basis of evaluating prior learning.

GA1: Intellectual rigour, GA2: Creativity, GA3: Ethical practice, GA4: Knowledge of a discipline, GA5: Lifelong learning, GA6: Communication and social skills, GA7: Cultural competence
On completion of this unit, students should be able to:GA1GA2GA3GA4GA5GA6GA7
1perform with technical competence, imagination and professionalism in methods of mooting and the arts of appellate court advocacyIntellectual rigourKnowledge of a disciplineCommunication and social skills
2demonstrate practical awareness of the ethical aspects of the roles and responsibilities of courtroom advocates and judgesIntellectual rigourKnowledge of a discipline
3show critical familiarity with classical, renaissance and modern theories and techniques of forensic rhetoric Intellectual rigourKnowledge of a discipline
4communicate complex ideas clearly and persuasively, by demonstrating the faculties of performance rhetoricIntellectual rigourKnowledge of a discipline
5demonstrate reflective appreciation of personal competence in the art of advocacy Intellectual rigourKnowledge of a discipline

On completion of this unit, students should be able to:

  1. perform with technical competence, imagination and professionalism in methods of mooting and the arts of appellate court advocacy
    • GA1: Intellectual rigour
    • GA4: Knowledge of a discipline
    • GA6: Communication and social skills
  2. demonstrate practical awareness of the ethical aspects of the roles and responsibilities of courtroom advocates and judges
    • GA1: Intellectual rigour
    • GA4: Knowledge of a discipline
  3. show critical familiarity with classical, renaissance and modern theories and techniques of forensic rhetoric
    • GA1: Intellectual rigour
    • GA4: Knowledge of a discipline
  4. communicate complex ideas clearly and persuasively, by demonstrating the faculties of performance rhetoric
    • GA1: Intellectual rigour
    • GA4: Knowledge of a discipline
  5. demonstrate reflective appreciation of personal competence in the art of advocacy
    • GA1: Intellectual rigour
    • GA4: Knowledge of a discipline

Teaching and assessment

Notice

Intensive offerings may or may not be scheduled in every session. Please refer to the timetable for further details.

Southern Cross University employs different teaching methods within units to provide students with the flexibility to choose the mode of learning that best suits them. SCU academics strive to use the latest approaches and, as a result, the learning modes and materials may change. The most current information regarding a unit will be provided to enrolled students at the beginning of the study session.

Fee information

Domestic

Commonwealth Supported courses
For information regarding Student Contribution Amounts please visit the Student Contribution Amounts.

Fee paying courses
For postgraduate or undergraduate full fee paying courses please check Domestic Postgraduate Fees OR Domestic Undergraduate Fees

International

Please check the international course and fee list to determine the relevant fees.

+